This is, without a doubt, one of the best reviews I've read since the death of Roger Ebert. Granted, it doesn't go into heavy detail about the acting, direction, screenwriting, etc. But it definitely has Ebert's flair and wit. The "It was as if someone had taken a piss on my steak and called [it?] sauce," line killed me. And I have to agree. How badly does it suck when the first three quarters of what seems to be a new classic get ruined by a retarded ending? I'd rather watch a movie that is overall not as good, but Is a fun mindless entertainment.
It brings to mind "The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen." Nice buildup (if a bit long) introducing us to all the characters, Peta Wilson, disappointingly clothed in Victorian prudery. We're then left with only 30 minutes of actual, conflict and action fighting the bad-guy, PETA Wilson, finally, in a sexy outfit for about 7 seconds of screen time. Between the cast, the concept and much of the filmmaking, a potential great movie. But the beginning was too long, the ending too short (and too easy for the heroes) and I walked away feeling short changed. It felt like the Pilot for a potentially great TV series. Even worse: the Ending of the Tom Cruise "War of the Worlds." His son (after disobeying his father to do something so incredibly stupid, my 10 year old - who has driven a bicycle into a tree, set fire to a carpet, made art with his own poo, among other crazy, dumb-ass things - said, "Dude's an idiot") is found to be alive at the end. It took the beautifully built bitter-sweet victory and turned it into "Independence Day." Nothing wrong with the latter movie, but it was a fun romp-type action movie all the way through and deserved its feel good ending. "War of the Worlds" was not and deserved better. Plus there was no need or point to his survival. He bit it so early in the movie, we were over it, used to it, moved on. Forgotten, even.
So endeth the rant.