I noticed there was no Video Bench Test included. It would have nice when comparing the Marantz SR7008 and Pioneer Elite SC-68 with the Sony.
Sony STR-DA5800ES A/V Receiver HT Labs Measures
Two channels driven continuously into 8-ohm loads:
0.1% distortion at 128.5 watts
1% distortion at 171.4 watts
Five channels driven continuously into 8-ohm loads:
0.1% distortion at 110.3 watts
1% distortion at 134.7 watts
Seven channels driven continuously into 8-ohm loads:
0.1% distortion at 98.5 watts
1% distortion at 118.7 watts
Analog frequency response in Analog Direct mode:
–0.05 dB at 10 Hz
–0.01 dB at 20 Hz
–0.08 dB at 20 kHz
–3.18 dB at 50 kHz
Analog frequency response with signal processing:
–0.35 dB at 10 Hz
–0.12 dB at 20 Hz
–3.25 dB at 20 kHz
–60.38 dB at 50 kHz
This graph shows that the STR-DA5800ES’s left channel, from CD input to speaker output with two channels driving 8-ohm loads, reaches 0.1 percent distortion at 128.5 watts and 1 percent distortion at 171.4 watts. Into 4 ohms, the amplifier reaches 0.1 percent distortion at 174.3 watts and 1 percent distortion at 242.6 watts.
Response from the multichannel input to the speaker output measures –0.15 decibels at 10 hertz, –0.05 dB at 20 Hz, –0.11 dB at 20 kilohertz, and –3.22 dB at 50 kHz. THD+N from the CD input to the speaker output was less than 0.029 percent at 1 kHz when driving 2.83 volts into an 8-ohm load. Crosstalk at 1 kHz driving 2.83 volts into an 8-ohm load was –65.56 dB left to right and –72.94 dB right to left. The signal-to-noise ratio with an 8-ohm load from 10 Hz to 24 kHz with “A” weighting was –102.71 dBrA.
From the Dolby Digital input to the loudspeaker output, the left channel measures –0.06 dB at 20 Hz and –0.39 dB at 20 kHz. The center channel measures –0.04 dB at 20 Hz and –0.44 dB at 20 kHz, and the left surround channel measures –0.04 dB at 20 Hz and –0.43 dB at 20 kHz. From the Dolby Digital input to the line-level output, the LFE channel is +0.01 dB at 20 Hz when referenced to the level at 40 Hz and reaches the upper 3-dB down point at 105 Hz and the upper 6-dB down point at 111 Hz.—MJP
- Log in or register to post comments



Wow... I would like to know why certain products(namely the top japanese brands who happen to be very popular and also the ones who advertise frequently in most major magazines)are credited specifically for their feature count and not specifically for their sound quality? Meaning we hear all about a model that has the latest bells & whistles (which could easily be described objectively), but who cares about the latest bells and whistles... Why aren't there any objective descriptions of actual sound quality? Funny how this reviewer doesn't like DSP modes(who does)? but managed to dig up some good sounding music to review with a few of this receiver's DSP modes! What about the rest of the music out there and how does it sound in stereo? Well I guess it would be fair if he at least admitted that the review was strictly subjective(or maybe even just based on advertisers dollars) as I have never heard 'this' Sony receiver(let alone other Sony models) ever sound as good as a comparably priced receiver from for eg. NAD, ARCAM, ANTHEM... albeit with fewer features. But yet for aprox. $2000 price range this Sony model was given a five star audio rating... Really? If consumers want to know about a product's feature list, they can easily check the brand's website for that. What we need to hear as consumers are objective (or at the very least subjective) descriptions of actual sound quality.
Consumers beware!

Fine review! I suspect those with a sincere interest in how this now discontinued Sony model sounds would have actually taken the time to go listen to one for themselves. A review can only get some interest going but can't replace an actual product demo. It sounds excellent in stereo btw.