I logged in to ask where the actual review was, only to find out that the other pages after page 1 were now available.
Samsung UN65KS9800FXZA LCD Ultra HDTV Review Specs
Dimensions (WxHxD, Inches): 56.8 x 32.8 x 4.6 (without stand); 56.8 x 36 x 14.4 (with stand)
Weight (Pounds): 62.2 (without stand); 69 (with stand)
Video Inputs: HDMI 2.0a (4), RF (antenna)
Other: Ex-Link, LAN, USB (3, including Internet of Things—IoT—Extend), Audio Return Channel on HDMI 4 (with compatible AVR)
Audio Outputs: Toslink optical digital
Price: $4,500
Company Info
Samsung
(800) 726-7864
samsung.com
- Log in or register to post comments
Or formatting and reinstalling the OS?
I can't tell if that's a joke or not. However, on my home computer, without being logged in to this website, I was able to see the subsequent pages. I don't know if they fixed it or if it was an error on my end; however, I believe I have seen this very issue several times before. At first I thought they were just doing a different review format but with this one it was obvious that there should've been more. Just wanted to give them a heads up that their web pages aren't always downloading like they're supposed to.
Samsung rejected the technology (Rumor has it, they were offered it for free)...because Dolby Vision OVERRIDES your calibration settings, HDR10 does NOT. This decision was made purely on performance grounds...Samsung didn't want to adopt a system that would "take control" of the set and override the calibrated settings.
DV fans need to face facts. It will remain on the market, but much like DTS vs. Dolby Digital, the "winner" is the one that is mandatory on the discs, and that is HDR10.
I was curious what the settings were for SDR before the calibration. Contrast of 52 seems low and backlight of 15 seems high. I was wondering if this was a typo.
Yet another review from S&V without input lag measurements. If the reviewers do not take it seriously (for every single set) then neither will the manufacturers.