I find two things interesting. The first is the lack of real figures, other than those of the plaintiff, being cited by the providers. Second is that the count has not set any "standard" that must be met for "proof" of HD content being truly HD. You would think that at some point the court might look to published technical data that was agreed to by manufacturers when getting governmental approval for using that term. Or have they been taking lessons in smoke and mirror publishing from our administration in Washington?
Liar, Liar, Screen on Fire
- Log in or register to post comments
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cd15/3cd1585a33c21d0cfedfaf53aeb1e3746fc1281c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29b67/29b67f7bb12612e650d0349bc1060f8ea13dc179" alt="Mark Fleischmann's picture Mark Fleischmann's picture"
Submitted by Mark Fleischmann (not verified) on February 7, 2007 - 12:13pm
What's sufficient for "high quality" HDTV depends on who you ask. CableLabs, the R&D arm of the cable industry, says 15mbps for HD VOD. ABC, which broadcasts HD in 720p, says that's enough. CBS, which broadcasts HD in 1080i, says 18mbps. I got these figures from Pete Putman in response to a direct question, so this would be a good moment to mention that his website hdtvexpert.com is a must-read.