That's neat to know that the ideal viewing angle -- if you aren't resolution-limited--is 30 degrees. Even with my old non-HD 48", I liked to sit within about 3 screen heights. So perhaps that's why (or maybe it's the kid in me). With regard to the limit at which you can tell the diff. between 1080 and 720, I will point out two things: (1) 20/20 is not "perfect" vision; I think it's merely the limit beyond which correction is not indicated. Many individuals (including myself) have vision that is 20/15 or 20/13. (2) I understand the arguments about the resolution limit of the human eye; but just because you're just at the point where you can't resolve two individual spots, does that mean that an entire field of spots (at that separation) will look no different from a uniform (non-spotted) field of equivalent density? I.e., is the two-spot resolution figure the right statistic for evaluating the perceptibility of resolution changes in pictures? I'd need to see some controlled studies before accepting that.
- REVIEWS
Displays Electronics 
Speakers Sources Other Gear Software - HOW TO
How To Buy How To Use Tech 101
You don't need 1080p
Viewing Distance vs. Resolution
Or, how I learned to stop worrying and love 720p.
Resolution starts (and ends) with the eye. If you're one of the lucky few with 20/20 vision (corrected or not), your eye can discern one-sixtieth of a degree of arc at 20 feet. Translated to inches, this means that, at 20 feet, your eye can discern objects roughly 0.067 inches wide, as long as there's enough of a contrast difference between the object and the background. This refers only to black-and-white info; your eye doesn't resolve color nearly as well as black-and-white. Also, eyes and contrast are a whole other GearWorks that I'll get to eventually. Lastly, we're going to stick with width for simplicity, although this discussion obviously applies to both width and height. Most people sit about 10 feet from their TVs. At this distance (and everything else being equal), your eye can resolve objects that are 0.033 inches wide.
Talk TV, Smart Guy
The average 42-inch-diagonal, 1,280-by-720 plasma or LCD display has pixels that are roughly 0.029 inches wide. (Of course, each model has different inter-pixel spacing, but, for now, we'll assume they don't.) If the same size display had a resolution of 1,920 by 1,080, the pixels would be 0.019 inches wide. As you can see, in a 42-inch display at a distance of 10 feet, your eye can't discern the resolution available even with 720p. Even more resolution is "wasted" at 1,920 by 1,080.
Now, assuming that you're not going to move your couch but you want a bigger TV, how does this work with a 50-inch set? The pixels in a 1,280-by-720 display are 0.034 inches wide, which is almost exactly what your eye can discern at 10 feet. A 1,920-by-1,080 display has 0.023-inch-wide pixels, smaller than your eye can resolve. A 1,920-by-1,080 display would have to measure more than 70 inches diagonally before you start testing your eyes' limits on the display's resolution (at least at 10 feet). Scan lines are the pixels of the CRT world and, in this case, function similarly. The pixels in some displays are not square, in which case you'll also need to check pixel height.
Hold Up, Math Whiz
That isn't the whole story. High resolution, in and of itself, isn't why the the move was made to HD. Ideally, a screen should fill 30 degrees of your field of view for so-called "optimum viewer enjoyment." This is why kids sit so close to the TV, and movies in the theater were more fun than your old TV. By making the screens wider and letting you sit closer (thanks to the higher resolution), the average TV's field of view went from 11 degrees (in most cases) with NTSC to 33 degrees with an ideal HDTV.
Rarely is everything ideal, though. The "3x picture height" rule that's tossed about as the ideal seating distance for HDTV (compared with 7x for NTSC) doesn't take into account that displays and high-definition material aren't perfect (and, until recently, none were really 1,920 by 1,080). Just because you can match or exceed your eye/pixel resolution doesn't mean that the material you're watching has anything close to that level of detail. Video noise, artifacts, and poor-quality low-resolution sources (NTSC cable/satellite feeds) are all too noticeable at close distances.
To split the difference between NTSC and HDTV, I recommend a 5x seating distance as a starting point (even at a loss of field of view). At 5x, your eye can almost exactly resolve 720p, regardless of screen size. Since the original writing, we put this math to the test, with intersting results. You can read that article here.
So, Can I Buy a Cheap TV?
Just because your eye can't resolve the additional resolution doesn't mean that you shouldn't get a higher-resolution set; it just means that you don't necessarily have to. From where most people sit, you don't need 1080p in a 37-42 inch TV. It's arguable that you do in a 50-inch set. The key, then, is moving your seating. If you're sitting more than 5x the picture height away from your TV, then you probably don't need 1080p. If you can move closer, you should get the highest resolution display you can, sit close enough that you can't see the pixels, and enjoy your huge screen.
The Math
(Screen Diagonal x 0.87) / Horizontal Resolution = Pixel Width
(Screen Diagonal x 0.49) / Vertical Resolution = Pixel Height
At a distance of 10 feet, the eye can resolve 1/120 of a degree
of arc, which translates to a width of 0.033 inches.
- Log in or register to post comments
COMMENTS
We did a follow up to test the math, with some interesting results. The link is in the article. Shortly after the original article was published, Panasonic released a study of their own with nearly identical results to the math here.
Just read the link. Looks like you're on the right track: you're trying to eliminate as many variables as possible, to isolate the comparison to resolution alone. Here's an alternate approach you might consider: You'll need an HD-DVD player, a 1080p display, and (two of) the best scaler you can find. Then compare Case I and Case II: Case I: output 1080i from the HD-DVD to one of the scalers, then output 1080p from this scaler to the display. Case II: Output 1080i from the HD-DVD to the first scaler; then output 540p from this first scaler to the second scaler; finally output 1080p from the second scaler to the display. Thus in Cases I and II you are feeding the display with 1080 and 540 lines of resolution, respectively. Yes, in Case II the signal is rescaled twice; but by doing "integral" scaling with good scalers, you may be introducing less variation than w/ your approach of using two different display models (w/ the attendant unavoidable differences in circuitry, calibration, and pixel struture).
I just read the review on the new Sony SXRD A2000 and it wasn't exactly a rave. I don't understand how the Grand Wega RPTV recieved a better overall rating a year and a half ago than this tv even though it has a 720p resolution compared to this tv which has a 1080p. I have looked at both tvs and for an aditional 300-500 dollars the new one blows the grand wega out of the water. In comparison to last years xbr it is a step down but the review has scared me off slightly. I thought this tv would be the one to replace my old Non-HD tv but your objection to lack of detail has left me a bit puzzled. Please help ease my mind.
Very nice explanation. A couple of questions:- Suppose I buy a 720p set now and in 2 years when blue ray DVD players are cheap, I get one of those. Can I feed the 1080p signal from the player to the 720p TV and see a nice clean picture? Will I need a scalar of sorts? Or will the DVD player output a 720p signal?- Which 720p TVs now are capable of processing a 1080p signal correctly for viewing - if any?Thanks very much
To John: Well, perhaps the limit of our eyesight with respect to spatial resolution - unless, like me, you like to sit quite close to the screen. But don't forget about gray-scale and color resolution. In these areas, I don't believe displays can meet the abilities of the human eye. Also, at 24 fps, we haven't reached the limit of our eyes' temporal resolution. Not to mention the noise that is often present from displays and sources. And I think you understand this all intuitively. After all, if TV displays and sources were perfect, with one eye closed (thus removing our binocular vision), we wouldn't be able to distinguish between what's on a display and what we see looking through a window. Yet of course even the best displayed video doesn't yet come close to real life. So there's still a long way to go before we get to the point where improvements in performance can no longer effect a noticeable difference in picture quality.
Refreshing to read someone who understands visual acuity. From experience, color, contrast, and resolution, in that order, will determine perception of quality. Note that resolution is last. That should offer further explaination to those folks who are confused about how a 720 display can look better than a 1080 display.
It's worth remembering that resolution is different in the vertical and horizontal directions. In principle, assuming a monochrome CRT, the horizontal direction is continuously varying in brightness whereas the vertical direction is sampled by the line structure. This means that the max spacial frequency vertically is limited at best to half that of the line structure. Therefore, the resolution horizontally is better than vertically. I realise the pixel structure of modern display devices upsets horizontal as well as vertical definition, because it imposes sampling on both, but it is worth remembering the basic limitations of a line-scanned system.
Note; the static image resolution test that found that the Sony A2000 displayed less than the full potential of a 1080p source has been resolved by Sony since some time during the August 2006 build. A free fix from Sony on a memory stick that can be inserted in the rear USB input is available for sets built prior to the fix. Sony claims that it not a real issue in that it is only a limit in displaying the static test image and is not a limit on real program material (which is 1080i/60 in any case. That is what Sony say's. There is a simple recalibration one can perform in the service menue to fix this without the USB memory card from Sony. People on the calibration/user blogs don't report that they see a resolution issue on these early sets before or after the "fix."RichardRichard.
Thanks for the its much appreciated[link]www.oyunara.net[/link][link]www.oyunim.com[/link][link]www.oyunulkesi.ne...
Thanks for the its much appreciated[link]www.oyunara.net[/link][link]www.oyunim.com[/link][link]www.oyunulkesi.ne...
<リンク:http://www.i-never.net/a001>高収入で上位表示の当サイトでお仕事GET！
Interesting post ToM. You said, “it uses and alters the shot material of Brando without his consent or creative consultation.” That might be somewhat difficult due to Brando’s being dead.http://www.plastikcerrahi.net
The Penis Enlargement program is the most powerful natural male enhancement program available anywhere in the world. With years of success behind our product and being one of the only companies that uses 100% natural ingredients we foresee you having great success.http://www.teomandogan.com
To John: Well, perhaps the limit of our eyesight with respect to spatial resolution - unless, like me, you like to sit quite close to the screen. But don't forget about gray-scale and color resolution. In these areas, I don't believe displays can meet the abilities of the human eye. Also, at 24 fps, we haven't reached the limit of our eyes' temporal resolution. Not to mention the noise that is often present from displays and sources. And I think you understand this all intuitively. After all, if TV displays and sources were perfect, with one eye closed (thus removing our binocular vision), we wouldn't be able to distinguish between what's on a display and what we see looking through a window. Yet of course even the best displayed video doesn't yet come close to real life. So there's still a long way to go before we get to the point where improvements in
thank you for you post , i will booke your article,[URL=http://www.handbagdrop.com/miu-miu-handbag.html]miu miu handbags[/URL][URL=http://www.handbagdrop.com/juicy-handbag.html]juicy handbags[/URL]
everything is good,will be better on tomorrow. wholesale replica handbag,shoes,wallet,jewelry, louis vuitton replica handbag: www.cloci.com/products_class.html?classid=90 coach purses; www.cloci.com/products_class.html?classid=91 chanel handbag: www.cloci.com/products_class.html?classid=93 gucci handbag, www.cloci.com/products_class.html?classid=94 juicy handbag: www.cloci.com/products_class.html?classid=99 db handbag: www.cloci.com/products_class.html?classid=100 ed hardy handbags: www.cloci.com/products_class.html?classid=102 Apparel/Pants/Jeans www.cloci.com/products_class.html?classid=97 Footwear/Boots/Sandals www.cloci.com/products_class.html?classid=260 Accessories/Electronics www.cloci.com/products_class.html?classid=98 alex
thanks http://www.cloci.com coach handbag http://www.cloci.com coach wholesale http://www.cloci.com wholesale purses
So there's still a long way to overcome before we get to the point where improvements in .i'm a student ,but i take a part-time job,welcome to my website www.edhardyhandbag.com.where there are many newst brand handbags .just have a look ,and you will get what you want .haha .thanks for your attention .http://edhardyhandbag.com/index.html
Do you know what the fashion is in this summer? Right now! Popular Fashion Storm is coming to you. Take your time to go to http://www.edhardyhandbag.com , you will find what you’ve dreamed. All fashion will show to you. http://www.edhardyhandbag.com will make you feel the new “space”, you can take time to indulge. Please feel free to contact me by email on my website .http://www.edhardyhandbag.com/products.asp?classid=101http://www.edhardy...
www.ben10-oyunlari.com" target="_blank" title="ben 10 oyunları">en güzel ben10 oyunları
Would you like to know what it is now popular in this summer? Would you like to know where fashion is? Come on, friends, let me lead you walk in the forefront of fashion, all tides of the trend are in your control. Welcome to visit our website http://www.handbag789.com http://www.handbag789.com/index.asp http://www.handbag789.com/products.asp?classid=230 http://www.handbag789.com/products.asp?classid=75http://www.handbag789.c... http://www.handbag789.com/products.asp?classid=106http://www.handbag789....
To split the difference between NTSC and HDTV, I recommend a 5x seating distance as a starting point (even at a loss of field of view). At 5x, your eye can almost exactly resolve 720p, regardless of screen size. Since the original writing, we put this math to the test, with intersting results. You can read that article http://www.oyunforumu.net
yo... interesting thoughts :)my wife amateur anal sex - amatuer movies ratingnude bbw artistic photography - bbw having sex on livetickling forced: forced lezbianfree pissing girl video: chicks busting to peepussy milk squirting peeing spyunder 18 forced sex law enforcers and celebrities
fkvFDQ Hello! and clarina and http://clarina-fda.viviti.com clarina and ryv and cheap lariam and http://lariam-fda.viviti.com cheap lariam and 019 and
Hi! and dentist grass valley california and attire beach flower girl wedding and american stroke association conference and car cost insurance less u and subaru impreza car insurance and ldeq conference and lisa see snow flower and
Howdy, and linux windows security comparison and interagency sedimentation conference and implant dentistry district of columbia and voip reading pa and laser dentistry los angeles and network security management components and
Hi! and best way to get out of debt and the watering can flower shop and canadian flower girl dresses and cosmetic dallas dentistry and wilmette flower shops and cold spring dentist and north carolina worker compensation insurance and
Hello! and conference baptist church evergreen and low income dentist and burnaby flower gift love romance and camera home security toronto and methamphetamine conference and flower delivery service montreal and dedicated windows server hosting and
Hello! and types of auto insurance coverage and card collector credit debt debt purchase and credit score what and by card credit score and georgia o keeffe flower paintings and bouquet flower silk snapdragons sunflower and payday loan debt management and
Hi! and bad consolidation credit debt mortg and college conference mac result wrestling and viktor and rolf flower bomb and long term debt to capital and medical conference june and explantion of credit rating scores and apsa conference proceedings and
I love this site child molester porn rdyacw clips fuckingbikini gtq nicole kidman porno >:PP illegal child rape vidoes ixdf young teen real pics 881810 little pussy photo uehtg sex bikini-stories %]] young teen bend over 7069 pics women competition swimsuit micro bikini 19683 sexu young teens %OOO max kiki bbs sports touzokudan 349 adult costume halloween young vvsaxm bikini dare orange 8-DDD older woman younger men porn saha ass thong tiny %-(( fucked cute teen 019782 cute teenage love quotes 605224 young asian girls galerie vfsd free young teen girls masterbating solo =-( bbs blog wenxuecity com 34037
Here is the newest coupon code for a free sample of replica mac cosmetics Zoom Lash mascara with any purchase. You will also get free shipping on your order. Just enter promotional code LASH510 at checkout at http://www.maccosmeticsreplica.com. Keep in mind that these offers expire after a period of time.
Pages
SPONSORED VIDEO
| Displays Electronics Speakers | |
Sources Other Gear Software | |
Top Picks of the Year Top Picks | |
Custom Install How To Buy How To Use | |
Tech 101
|
|
Latest News Features Blogs | |
Resources Subscriptions |
WHERE TECHNOLOGY BECOMES ENTERTAINMENT
© 2024 Sound&VisionAVTech Media Americas Inc., USA
All rights reserved
