Surround Processor Reviews

Marantz AV8802 Surround Processor Review Test Bench

Test Bench

Analog frequency response in Pure Direct mode:
–0.14 dB at 10 Hz
–0.04 dB at 20 Hz
–0.01 dB at 20 kHz
–0.05 dB at 50 kHz.

Analog frequency response with signal processing:
–0.84 dB at 10 Hz
–0.25 dB at 20 Hz
–3.29 dB at 20 kHz
–55.14 dB at 50 kHz.

515mar.meas.jpg

The above chart shows the frequency response of the left (aqua), center (green), LFE (purple), and left surround (red) channels at the preamp outputs of the Dolby Digital decoder. The left channel measures –0.04 decibels at 20 hertz and –2.11 dB at 20 kilohertz. The center channel measures –0.04 dB at 20 Hz and –2.12 dB at 20 kHz, and the left surround channel measures –0.02 dB at 20 Hz and –2.11 dB at 20 kHz. The LFE channel, normalized to the level at 40 Hz, is +0.01 dB at 20 Hz, reaches the upper –3dB point at 118 Hz, and reaches the upper –6dB point at 121 Hz.

Response from the multichannel input to the main output measures –0.13 dB at 10 Hz, –0.04 dB at 20 Hz, –0.01 dB at 20 kHz, and –0.06 dB at 50 kHz. The analog THD+N was less than 0.008% at 1 kHz with a 100-millivolt input and the volume control set to 82.5. Crosstalk with a 100-mV input was –92.21 dB left to right and –93.16 dB right to left. The signal-to-noise ratio with “A” weighting was –130.38 dBrA.—MJP

515mar.vidmeas.jpg

COMPANY INFO
Marantz
(201) 762-6500
us.marantz.com
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
etrochez's picture
Submitted by etrochez on May 21, 2015 - 1:47pm

David, do you find that the AT IC-6 speakers blend well with the MK system?
Thanks.

David Vaughn's picture
Submitted by David Vaughn on May 21, 2015 - 11:28pm
yes...I find they blend quite well. I wall s150s would have been better, but I couldn't justify the extra expense for them.
Cos's picture
Submitted by Cos on May 21, 2015 - 9:13pm

Not sure when this review was written, but the Upgrade for HDCP 2.2 starts June 1st the information and forms necessary to complete the process are online on their website.

David Vaughn's picture
Submitted by David Vaughn on May 21, 2015 - 11:30pm
i wrote the original article in February and it didn't hit the new stands until last week. Marantz didn't have the timetable set when we went to print, which was a while ago (lead time for print is much longer than online).
Jonasandezekiel's picture
Submitted by Jonasandezekiel on May 22, 2015 - 7:52am

Hi David. Okay, please do me a favor and ease me off the ledge I'm ready to jump off...I just bought the previous generation 8801 processor. (haven't even unboxed it yet) Are the sonic upgrades enough that I should buy the new one? I'm not ready to go Atmos any time soon, but all the improvements you write about make me wonder if I should just grit my teeth and get the new one. What's your opinion?

David Vaughn's picture
Submitted by David Vaughn on May 22, 2015 - 10:34am
Jonas, if I wasn't upgrading to Atmos, I would have happily kept my 8801 since I rarely listen to 2-channel music unless I'm doing a review (I just don't have the time!). If you're big into 2-channel, then the 8802 is quite a bit better in this regard (if you can listen to the two right after another). For movies, the 8802 is slightly better with surround imaging placement (but that could be the Atmos-effect I'm hearing). Also a thing to consider, you probably bought the 8801 for a very good price (at or below $2k) and you'll pay substantially more for an 8802 (as much as 2x as much) and when you take that into consideration, the 8801 becomes a much better value. As you are probably aware, the law of diminishing returns definitely take hold when comparing AV gear! Let me know if you have any further questions...I'm happy to answer.
Jonasandezekiel's picture
Submitted by Jonasandezekiel on May 22, 2015 - 8:15pm

Thanks David. Yes, I bought it for 1800.00, so I got a good deal for sure on a great piece. Its actually my first venture into separates, so I was quite excited. But when the new one came out, I turned a little green with envy at the thought of a radical overhaul. I was hoping the difference was going to be just a Dolby Atmos sticker slapped on the front of it, but they hit it out of the park.

hk2000's picture
Submitted by hk2000 on May 22, 2015 - 3:16pm

I don't mind it when commentators make this mistake, but the reviewer should know better.

David Vaughn's picture
Submitted by David Vaughn on May 22, 2015 - 5:35pm
Sorry for the typo...I know it's DLNA (Digital Living Network Alliance). I'll contact the webmaster and get it fixed. You should be a copy editor because it made it through 3 different people (maybe 4) before it hit the newsstands and web and no one caught that...first of all, ME!
Bob Ankosko's picture
Submitted by Bob Ankosko on May 22, 2015 - 9:41pm
...that has now been fixed.
David Vaughn's picture
Submitted by David Vaughn on May 23, 2015 - 12:37pm
Thanks Bob!
hk2000's picture
Submitted by hk2000 on May 22, 2015 - 3:33pm

So can anyone point to me the benefit of getting this instead of the Onkyo PR-SC5530? Comparing the 2, I was unable to find any thing that The Marantz offers that the Onkyo does not, quite the opposite. So why is this worth $1,500 more?

David Vaughn's picture
Submitted by David Vaughn on May 22, 2015 - 5:33pm
Onkyo/Integra have had severe reliability issues the past five years with their HDMI boards. The good news is they've stood behind their products, the bad news is that end users have had to send their gear in for repair (sometimes multiple times).
hk2000's picture
Submitted by hk2000 on May 22, 2015 - 9:13pm

Yeah, I kind of agree based on what I've seen on forums and such but I've had their very first one (SC885) since 2011 w/o any issues. That and the price difference is just huge. I also missed the Audyssey aspect mentioned by another poster here. I for one would go for the Onkyo sc5509 with Audyssey MultEQ XT 32 /Dynamic EQ & Dynamic Volume, considering I'd never use more than 5 channel surround and to me Atmos and DTS equivalent are no more than gimmiks, but that's just me.

David Vaughn's picture
Submitted by David Vaughn on May 22, 2015 - 11:20pm
I had the 885 as well and it was great. My next Integra (80.2) wasn't so good. Went through three of them (thankfully Integra replaced them) in less than a year due to HDMI issues. I thought I was alone until the thread popped up at AVS and I was able to see how widespread the problem had become.
hk2000's picture
Submitted by hk2000 on May 23, 2015 - 7:00am

I'm actually hoping for mine to die,(I hate the hassle of selling). I'm researching all available options out there, I usually don't go for the luxury upgrade (Lexus over Toyota, Elite over Pioneer,..etc)but in this case that goes double, The Integras look awful.. this Marantz on the other hand looks gorgeous, but not $1500 worth of gorgeous to me.

David Vaughn's picture
Submitted by David Vaughn on May 23, 2015 - 10:52am
If you're looking to save some coin, check out the Marantz AV7702...I have a couple of friends who used it before the 8802 and they were very impressed with it for the price.
jnemesh's picture
Submitted by jnemesh on May 26, 2015 - 11:40am

I had a mid range TXNR609...very first piece of electronics where I said "YES! It's finally broken!". To say I was disappointed in the performance and operation of this unit would be an understatement. I upgraded to the Marantz SR7007, and haven't regretted it one bit. Now, I did jump up (quite a bit) in cost, but Marantz, in general, will ALWAYS sound better than Onkyo/Integra.

Cos's picture
Submitted by Cos on May 22, 2015 - 7:48pm

Multiple reasons, some already stated
1. Reliability / Build Quality
2. Room Correction - Audyssey MultiEQ XT32 vs. Onkyo Accu-EQ
3. Onkyo's HDCP 2.2 solution is not full bandwidth and will not do 4:4:4 60hz 4k Video
4. Better User Interface

The forth may be personal opinion, but the rest are pretty substantial reasons to go with the Marantz IMO. I had a DHC 80.3 Integra, and it was a great pre pro, but I think Onkyo/Integra started to go downhill from there.

Douglas Kelly's picture
Submitted by Douglas Kelly on May 23, 2015 - 5:43pm

I've become more interested in DSD recordings which are becoming more plentiful. I didn't see any information on the DACs used in the 8002 and whether the unit will play 64fs, 128fs and 256fs. Could you elaborate on the 8802's ability to play DSDs?

UltimateGuitar's picture
Submitted by UltimateGuitar on May 25, 2015 - 12:59pm

I've got just a 2 (maybe 3) channel system, is a Receiver like this wasted on such a system ?

Any idea how much idle/active power it consumes ? I was attracted to the Pioneer Ice-Power for it's power efficiency. Just wondering how the Marantz compares in efficiency.

David Vaughn's picture
Submitted by David Vaughn on May 25, 2015 - 4:42pm
This is a pre/pro, not an AVR, so there are no amps in the box, just processing power.
harbir's picture
Submitted by harbir on May 25, 2015 - 6:22pm

4 grand for a unit that can't handle 2 discrete subwoofer channels and will be obsolete in 2 years?

No thanks.

Jonasandezekiel's picture
Submitted by Jonasandezekiel on May 26, 2015 - 6:57am

I'm certain it can handle two subs, my 7708 receiver can do that. The price is intimidating though.

harbir's picture
Submitted by harbir on May 26, 2015 - 10:31am

It has only one subwoofer channel that has two outputs individual level controls. So you can attach two subs and playback at different levels, but they'll play exactly the same signal. That's
very different from a unit that can set a discrete left and right channel to a pair of subs, band also different from adjusting EQ, distance And phase individually for each sub depending on the effects of the location of each.

It's tough to do because the subs interact with each other in complex ways, but a $4000 pre pro that can't handle this job just isn't acceptable to me.

David Vaughn's picture
Submitted by David Vaughn on May 26, 2015 - 10:31am
It can handle two discrete subwoofer channels and most everything in the A/V world will be obsolete in 2 years, but no one says you have to buy a new one then.
jnemesh's picture
Submitted by jnemesh on May 26, 2015 - 11:43am

You are optimistic! :) I always assume the tech I am buying is obsolete out of the box. Best thing to do is stop reading about new gear after a purchase...but what fun would that be?

harbir's picture
Submitted by harbir on May 26, 2015 - 7:42pm

If it can handle 2 discrete subwoofer channels, then this in the text of the review needs to be clarified:

"This includes dual subwoofer outputs with XLR and RCA connections for each. These are on a single channel, but there are independent level settings for each subwoofer. "

David Vaughn's picture
Submitted by David Vaughn on May 26, 2015 - 8:57pm
It's the .1 of a 5.1, 7.1, 7.4.1, etc. system. There are no discrete .2 signals that I know of for dual subwoofers. What the unit does is take the LFE information, split it in two for the two outputs (if you enable the second subwoofer in the setup menu), then allows for distance and volume level for each subwoofer. Additionally, if you engage Audyssey, it will calibrate each sub independently. Hopefully this clears things up for you.
acemt's picture
Submitted by acemt on May 27, 2015 - 7:21am

Thanks for the review David. Maybe I am missing it somewhere on the website, but can you please tell me what AMPS you used with your test setup and the Marantz. Thanks

David Vaughn's picture
Submitted by David Vaughn on May 27, 2015 - 8:35am
I used a Parasound A51 for the left, center, right, r & l surround. I used a Parasound Zonemaster 1250 (bridged to 6 channels) for the l & r rear surrounds and 4 overhead Atmos speakers. I usually list this in the review, but it was probably cut for space constraints.
David Vaughn's picture
Submitted by David Vaughn on May 27, 2015 - 8:34am
I used a Parasound A51 for the left, center, right, r & l surround. I used a Parasound Zonemaster 1250 (bridged to 6 channels) for the l & r rear surrounds and 4 overhead Atmos speakers. I usually list this in the review, but it was probably cut for space constraints.
acemt's picture
Submitted by acemt on May 27, 2015 - 9:13am

Thanks

tgkunz's picture
Submitted by tgkunz on June 5, 2015 - 7:16pm

I'm not forking over one more cent for additional surrounds. If the manufacturers want me to inve$t in more channels - then let them get me the two missing front channels that are between the left and center, and the right and center front channels. These front channels have been in most multichannel movies since "Oklahoma!" came out in 1955! No more surrounds! Now,get with it!

Steveuno's picture
Submitted by Steveuno on June 9, 2015 - 8:51am

Hi David,
After reading the review on the Marantz AV8802 Surround Processor i need to ask a few questions for my next step.
we are building a "home theater" 6.0 m x 4.5m, the speakers are whatmough P series P31, P06, P11 and FX speakers, along a typhoon sub, so 7.1.
my budget had been a round 8k ( pre amp/power amp)+ 1k for cables and install costs for audio only.
Knowing the AV8802 will be around the $3.3k that leaves me $4.7K + install costs for the preamp/power amp.
i will be installing 2 more ceiling speakers to use some of the ATMOS technology, however this can be done a little later.

oh, i can hear the readers saying run the cables while you are doing the install/ Reno, and yes i will run all the wires for future speakers.
My question is if i go down the path of the what would you suggest would complement the 8802 preamp?
I have been steered to Rotel, parasound, then others have suggested Marantz.
Here is my conundrum, which brand will complement the above mentioned (5ch + 2ch,)Power amp giving me 7.1 ch.
or do i purchase 2 x 5 ch, with built in capacity for future speaker installs ( max 3) i know.
any help greatly appreciated.

Steve

David Vaughn's picture
Submitted by David Vaughn on June 15, 2015 - 2:27pm
I use Parasound amps and am partial to them. The ATI signature series is also very good for a similar price point. The most economical way to go is to buy the 10-channels now versus a 5 and a 2 and then having to sell the 2 channel when you upgrade. The other choice would be to get the 7 channel ATI and then in the future buy an additional amp for the number of channels you need. Another good choice would be a Krell Chorus amp...tons of power, but may be out of your price range. Another thing to consider as well is looking on the used market. There are a ton of deals on Audiogon and you can really get a lot of bang for your buck buying used.
Country Roads Take Me Home's picture
Submitted by Country Roads T... on August 2, 2015 - 1:45pm

David, I really enjoyed reading your review on the Marantz AV8802. In fact, you have helped me finalize my decision on purchasing such a high quality upgrade. Would you care to recommend a few amps that would match the quality of the 8802? I will be utilizing a seven channel system (no Atmos yet :( ). I know I can match the Marantz seven channel amp and get 150 W per channel with a perfectly matching appearance. I was also thinking about going with Emotiva's seven channel amp which I believe will give me 200 W per channel and cost significantly less. Can you help me find an amp of outstanding quality that does not completely break the bank?

Country Roads Take Me Home's picture
Submitted by Country Roads T... on August 2, 2015 - 2:13pm

My apologies, I overlooked your post about how you're partial to Parasound. I do want to clarify that I'm probably going to be looking for a seven channel amp mainly to conserve shelf space - if I ever decide to go Atmos I would purchase another amp. I don't believe Parasound offers a seven channel amp. That's why I was really thinking about Marantz for the matching looks or Emotiva for the extra power and excellent price. Thoughts?

David Vaughn's picture
Submitted by David Vaughn on December 18, 2015 - 11:52am
So sorry for the late reply, I think our notifications system is broken. Anyway, the Marantz amp would be fine for movies, not so much for music. I haven't listened to any Emotiva with my own setup, but my colleague, Kris Deering, has some in his system and they sounded great at his house.
Mike_OConnor's picture
Submitted by Mike_OConnor on August 5, 2015 - 4:27pm

hello David i've decided to buy a Atoms sound system . i read this well written review and after that i'm in doubt now between Marantz 8802 and Denon AVR-X7200WA with Hdcp 2.2 integrated please tell me which one is more suitable with my TV Samsung UN65JS9500 and Blu-ray Player Pioneer Elite BDP-88FD ? do I also need to buy another Amplifier ? I also need a 7.1 channel speakers ? what are your recommendations ?

David Vaughn's picture
Submitted by David Vaughn on December 18, 2015 - 11:54am
Mike, I love the 8802 and a dealer in Minnesota did a listener test with a group of customers and determined that the 8802 was "better" than the AVR-7200. That being said, the 8802 will cost you a lot more when you add in amplifiers and depending on your listening habits, you may not notice a significant different between the two.
HYDANIL's picture
Submitted by HYDANIL on August 27, 2015 - 9:13am

David.. Review is very useful.. Currently I have Onkyo NR3030 and enjoying every bit of it.. the show stealer is Dolby Surround Mixer for non Atmos discs.. Have you tested DSU in AV8802? Also, did you experience the DTS Neural surround? An up-mixer solution like DSU

David Vaughn's picture
Submitted by David Vaughn on December 18, 2015 - 11:55am
Yes...I use DSU on all non-Atmos discs and love what it does. I don't use the DTS Neural surround.
George p.g's picture
Submitted by George p.g on December 30, 2015 - 2:41am

Which amplifier can preferable for klipsch rp280,rp260,rp450..speakers with marantz for 11 channel setup.

Flash's picture
Submitted by Flash on February 4, 2016 - 10:39pm

Can Some one please elaborate a bit on the Chroma resolution fail? Does this mean that an AV8802 cant pass HDMI video without degrading it?

bauhaus's picture
Submitted by bauhaus on June 1, 2016 - 6:05pm

This post is intended for David Vaughn.
Hi David, I've enjoyed your review on the Marantz AV8802 pre pro that you did last year. Thank you for that. I'm curious how the Marantz AV8802 would compare against the Classe SSP 800, Classe Sigma SSP and the Meridian 861 v8 reference pre pros.
Can you comment on their two-channel performances as well as surround sound performances for movies? I did demo the Meridian 861 v8 reference pre pro, the Classe SSP 800 & the Classe Sigma SSP at my local dealer but not the Marantz. My local dealer does not sell Marantz. They carry the Meridian, Classe, McIntosh, NAD, Rotel, Audio Research, Dan D'Agostino, Linn, Datasat, Theta Digital, etc.
Anyways, the Meridian and both Classe performed fantastic in both two-channel and home theater. The Meridian 861 v8 was superior to both Classe in both two-channel and home theater. It was expected though due to massive price differences between the Meridian 861 v8 and the Classe. I'm not sure if the Marantz AV8802 could compare to the Meridian 861 v8 and the Classe (SSP 800 & Sigma) sonically.
I'm willing to pay for whatever price as long as I can get the best fidelity in both two-channel performance for music and home theater. And I'm not interested in Dolby Atoms, Aura 3D, hdcp 2.2. I don't care about the feature set or bells and whistles. All I care is about the audio fidelity or performances in both two-channel for music and home theater. I currently have the Ayre universal bluray disc player and the Linn Klimax DS digital streamer/DAC as my stereo source for music.
Fyi, I've been using the Linn Kisto pre pro with all Linn amplification and all Linn speaker system for the last 10 years but the Kisto got really outdated. Linn Kisto was Linn's flagship av preamp surround processor but it isn't equipped with hdmi connections because the Kisto was first released before bluray came out.
I had the Ayre bluray player connected to the Linn Kisto via multi-channel analog audio and hdmi out of the Ayre bluray player directly to the TV. Previously I used to have the Linn Unidisk 1.1 universal disc player connected to the Linn Kisto.
Your advise will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

X